Showing posts with label Introduction to Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Introduction to Blog. Show all posts

Sunday, October 16, 2011

A Nod To Muhammad

I haven't done regular posts for a while here and thought I should.  I'll keep posting about the five points of Calvinism, but I've been considering what text I should work on?  I've been pretty exhausted, and so I don't want to do something difficult and unfamiliar.  I will eventually be doing M. Alder's volume How To Think About God, but I thought I'd do something easier (for me) for now: The Quran.



Many people might ask why I am bothering doing the Quran.  By Christians this book is generally considered, at best, a heretical text.  And it is ultimately sacred to a billion people on the planet.  Most people in my position wouldn't touch it.

Here's some reasons why I want to comment on the Quran:
1. I've read it a few times already, including a commentary and I've done some Quran studies.  It's pretty familiar to me already, so it's easy.
2. It is easily accessible.  I'm going to be using Yusuf Ali's translation primarily, which you can find online at this location. 
3. The Quran is much misunderstood and maligned both by those who haven't read it and by some who have.  It is good to read it in light of how it was originally intended.
4. I'd like to comment some on Christian assumptions about Islam, if it applies to the Quran.

Here's some introductory notes before we get started:

The Quran is not the same as Islam
The Quran is where Islam began, and it the source of it's most important traditions, but Islam is not limited to it's most holy book.  We will be discussing the book, not Islam as a whole.  Islam, like all world religions, can't be distilled in a single point of view or theological summary.  It is a variety of viewpoints and many interpretations of many texts.   It is best not to judge the whole religion based on one text or one point of view. To talk about the Quran is to focus on one slice of Islam, a much bigger pie.

The Quran is Organized Differently
The Quran is divided into Suras, not chapters or books.  The Suras aren't organized chronologically, but roughly by size.  For the novice, reading the Quran from front to back is misleading, because there is no sense of development.  In fact, most of the longer Suras, found in the front of the Quran, are dated later than most of the others.  And many of the shorter Suras, at the back of the Quran, are dated early.  Thus, my recommendation, if you don't have a list of the chronological arrangement of the Quran, and if you are reading it for the first time is to read the Suras from back to front.  This way you have a better sense of the development.  In this read of the Quran, I won't follow a strictly chronological order, nor will I be commenting on all the Suras, but I will be referring to this chronological list.

The Real Quran is in Arabic
Every Muslim and every Quranic scholar will tell you that the Quran should really be read in the original language.  To hear the Quran recited in Arabic, even a little bit, you can understand why.   (Get a taste of it here)  The poetry and the language is a part of the experience of the Quran.  To read the Quran in English is to grasp a meaning of the Quran, but not to experience it fully.  Of course, here we will have to settle for the English.  I don't know Arabic and I doubt many (or any) of the readers of the blog will know Arabic.

The Historical Context is Important
Each Sura is a poem which was given to Muhammad on a particular occasion.  Each Sura is God speaking to Muhammad about that occasion.  Thus, to understand a number of Suras, we have to know the occasion to which the Sura is speaking.  This is where we use Quranic commentaries.  I have found Yusuf Ali's commentary most helpful in providing a context for each Sura.

I am NOT a Quranic Scholar
Just like the other texts I discuss in this blog, I am not necessarily an expert on the subject.  I am just expressing my opinion from my particular theological viewpoint.  I will agree with some parts of the Quran and I will disagree with others, just like any other theological text.  If I were Muslim, that would be unacceptable, but I am a Jesus-centrist and so my viewpoints come from that perspective.  I might get my understanding of the Quran wrong, just like I might any other text, especially ancient.  Just blame my ignorance, and please correct me.


Wednesday, January 26, 2011

How To Be A Saint by Jack Bernard



I love this book. Honestly, How To Be A Saint is my favorite book on Christian spirituality. This isn't a perfect representation of my philosophy of the spiritual life, but it is really, really close. I'll be writing about this, off and on.

Jack Bernard was the founder of Church of the Sojourners in San Francisco, and he died in 2002. Check out their blog at this link. The best recommendation for this book is by Jon Stock: "Jack Bernard we the real deal, a radical Christian who walked the talk." And this one by Mark Scandrette: "His transparent and intelligent words on how to become a saint have the added weight of Jack's life. He lived the pages of this book." This book is born out of Jack's experience, not out of ideals he might have had, but didn't practice. This doesn't make the book more representative of God, but it does make it possible, practicable, and true to life.

This doesn't stop my work on Mere Christianity. But I've been having trouble having the book with me when I need it to write. So, if I don't have Lewis in my pocket, perhaps I'll post on Bernard.

By the way, my wife thinks its funny that "Bernard" wrote a book about sainthood. St. Bernard. You know.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Looking for Suggestions

Well, I've finished my set on "Tough Questions for Christians"-- AZ hasn't made any more since question 36. It was fun, though.

I've got some fill in stuff to use, but I have a question for you. I have a number of books I could read and comment on, but what would you like to see?

Eat, Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert, which has recently been made into a movie
The Shack the popular Christian novel by Gresham local William Young
The Thomas Merton Reader, which I have on my shelf from the library
Introduction to Ethics, a lecture series by Catholic Philosopher Peter Kreeft
Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, which I could re-read and make comments on
The Imitation of Christ, the classic by Thomas Kempis
or
Spiritual Life In Anabaptism, a reader of sixteenth century Anabaptist writers.

If you have any opinion, make a comment or send me a note.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

New Book I'm Reading...

Surprised by Christ by Rev. A. James Bernstein

Written by someone born as an Orthodox Jew and became an evangelical believer on his way to eventually become an Eastern Orthodox priest. Busy guy. My quotes and comments will all be focused on the final third of the book where he speak about Jesus’ atonement.

I'll be posting quotes and comments from the book, in between "Tough Questions".

Friday, June 4, 2010

Anthropology

We're going back to Millard Erikson's edited book Readings for Christian Theology. In Volume 2, he's got a section on the study of humanity. I'll be writing about that for a while.

Monday, March 29, 2010

"God Is Not Great"

For the next set of posts, I'm going to be writing in response to God Is Not Great by Christopher Hitchins. This may seem a little different for a theology blog, but I've been wanting to read a book from one of the recent evangelists of atheism. I wanted to read partly because of curiosity of what they had to say about religion, but also because they are offering a theological perspective, even if it is an anti-theology.

I refused to read one of Richard Dawkins' books, because in interviews I heard of him, I found him arrogant and rude, and I didn't want to be goaded into anger. After listening (I'm hearing the audio book) to Hitchins for a couple chapters, I find his arguments to be reasonable, plausible, and, most of all, polite. He is not there to mock believers, but to explain why he feels that religion is backward and even hazardous to humanity as a whole.

I am happy to interact with this book, and I hope that I can express my retort in as politely and firmly as he.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Aristotle's Ethics

I’ve been listening to lectures by Father Joseph Koterski on Aristotle’s Ethics, and it’s taken up quite a bit of my thinking time on theology, so I’m going to respond to that for a while.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Moving Right Along...

Okay, we're done with The Knowledge of the Holy. Good stuff, but time to move on. So, for a while, I'll be reading essays from Readings in Christian Theology, vol. I edited by Millard Erickson. I won't begin from the beginning, but I'm doing readings from his section on Revelation. No, not the book, but the idea of God revealing Himself through the Bible. If you want to read about the book, check out my blog on Revelation: An Illustrated Commentary.

For the next few blogs, I'll be posting about a conversation myself and some other Mennonite pastors had about theology. Then I'll begin posting from Erickson's Readings, beginning with Kenneth S. Kantzer's "The Authority of the Bible".

Since we are in "meta" mode, I'd like to mention briefly about my series of postings on The Law. I think I mentioned in a comment that they are intended to be read as a whole, not any as an individual part. Sometimes I get an idea in my head and it takes a while to state the whole thing. Sorry if you find my posts too long or dull. Other blogs have shorter posts. But when discussing theology, I like to get a whole idea out, if I can.

Friday, January 8, 2010

The Knowledge of the Holy by A.W. Tozer

I decided that I should read and write a book on Theology Proper-- the study of God Himself. His nature, His character, etc. There are a number of books I could have read: The Existence and Attributes of God by Stephen Charnock, Christian Theology by Millard Erickson, or the Dogmatics by Karl Barth. I looked for The Institutes by John Calvin, but couldn't find it on the shelf at the library. After getting home, I looked on my own shelf and found The Knowledge of the Holy by A. W. Tozer. Then I knew I had found the right book.

First of all, it's a slim book, unlike, say, Barth's Dogmatics. So I'll be able to get through it relatively quickly. Secondly, it covers briefly all the main points of orthodox knowledge about God-- the Trinity, and all the basic attributes of God. Also, Tozer has wonderful prose-- I have always loved his writing and at times have wanted to copy it. I also wished I could have visited his church one Sunday in his crowded facility and listened to him rail on the state of the church-- also one of my favorite subjects.

This is not to say that I agree with Tozer all the time. He goes too far in his judgments, even of the church. And, as you shall see, I certainly don't agree with Tozer in his theology all the time. But I still think that this is one of the most worthwhile books on God ever. Even when he's wrong, Tozer still gets the basics right.

Find this book. You should be able to get it in the library. Follow along with me. I'm probably going to post a chapter a day, although I have a lot to say on his five page chapters. It's dense stuff.

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Christian Ethics: A Brief History

The next book I'm going to reflect on is not a "classic" text on theology, but it discusses many classic texts. It is Christian Ethics: A Brief History by Michael Banner. It was just published this last year.

This book comments on a few important texts for the development of Christian Ethics throughout the ages. It discusses Benedict's Rule, The City of God by Augustine (and Augustinian theology as a whole), Aquinas' work on ethics, Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling, Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, Karl Barth's Dogmatics as well as John Paul II's work on the sanctity of life.

But I won't be looking at each of these works individually. Rather, I'll just be making comments about the comments made. This isn't how most of the blog will be, but I want to get ahead in my writing somewhat, and this gives me a space of time to write about the next book before it's up in the blog.

BTW, the next volume after this is A.W. Tozer's The Knowledge of the Holy. We've got some other good books as well on the shelf. Poetry by Leo of Leon, Works by Pseudo-Dionysus , some Quaker Spirituality and more. Lots of fun stuff.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The Plan for This Blog

Celebration! This is my 20th blog!

Okay, so what are we about here? The basic plan is to have a discussion of various theological points. That sounds really dull on the surface, but theology is exciting. Millions of people have died on theological points, nations have fallen, religions rose and fall and friendships have been broken. That doesn't sound like an auspicious beginning for a blog by a Mennonite, but I'm just saying that theology is exciting.

I'm not planning on beginning any bloodshed. Rather, as the post says, I am hoping that this discussion on theology will allow us to devote ourselves better to God, loving Him and following Jesus better. My first few posts will be kinda dull and long, perhaps, but they'll get shorter and more interesting as we go along.

After a couple introductory posts, this is the basic plan:

I am going to devotionally read classic theological works, beginning with Bonaventure's Tree of Life. I invite any reader of the blog to join me in reading the work.

I will compare these theologies to what I understand to be the theology of Jesus.

I will write devotional quotes or descriptions or critiques of the theology I read in order to re-describe Jesus' theology.

I will also occasionally put my own thoughts about Jesus' theology without reference to a classic theological work. Just for fun.

Anyone is welcome to challenge me or to ask questions at any point.

I will put my comment under some main theological categories:
Theology proper, Ecclesiology, Ethics, Anawim theology, etc.
Hopefully, over time, this blog will develop into full theology. One that makes sense as a whole, I hope.

So that's what we got! Hope you enjoy it! Or, if I'm writing to myself into cyberspace, that's okay, too!

Steve